Review Report (Institutional) Review Report (Institutional) A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Name of Institution Date Purpose of the review Write no more than two sentences indicating the category of the visit and why it is being performed. Brief description of the institution Write no more than three sentences describing the institution that is subject to the review. Compliance Summary This is a summary of Section D: FINDINGS of this Review Report and relates to the Institutional Standards (part A) of the Standards and Guidelines for ECTE Accreditation A.1 - Identity and Purpose Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A.2 - Governance and quality assurance Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A.3 - Human Resources Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A.4 - Community and Resources Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A.5 - Educational Resources Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A. 6 - Finances and Sustainability Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant Recommendation of the panel Summarise in one or two sentences the panel's recommendation relating to institutional accreditation. Mention requirements that prejudge accreditation. B. INTRODUCTION TO THE REVIEW This section explains the nature, purpose and activities of the review and introduces the VET panel. Classification of the review Institutional Accreditation Programme Accreditation Cyclical Review Background and reason for the review Include a brief history of the relationship of the institution with the ECTE leading up to the review. Findings of previous reviews These should include previous recommendations and requirements. Considering that this is an institutional accreditation, there may be no previous findings. If so, indicate that the school has never been previously reviewed. Description of the review process Please make reference to the ECTE Guidelines for Site Visits and to the Criteria and Procedures for ECTE Accreditation. In the description, include logistical and administrative support, how decisions were made, etc. Terms of reference of the review Site visit activities Provide a list of the activities that took place during the site visit including a list of stakeholders who were interviewed. Visitation language Write the language in which the visit was conducted. Institutional language Write the main institutional/programme language. Translation arrangements If the visitation language was different from the main institutional/programme language, please describe translation arrangements. The Self Evaluation Report Give a description and an evaluation of the Institutional Self Evaluation Report and relative documentation that was provided for the site visit. Composition of the VET Panel Name Country Dropdown Team LeaderStudent panel memberRegular panel memberReview Secretary First ECTE visit? Yes No Name Country Dropdown Team LeaderStudent panel memberRegular panel memberReview Secretary First ECTE visit? Yes No Name Country Dropdown Team LeaderStudent panel memberRegular panel memberReview Secretary First ECTE visit? Yes No Name Country Dropdown Team LeaderStudent panel memberRegular panel memberReview Secretary First ECTE visit? Yes No Name Country Position Team LeaderStudent panel memberRegular panel memberReview Secretary First ECTE visit? Yes No C. INTRODUCTION TO THE INSTITUTION This section provides important general information on the institution. Name and brief history of the institution Organisational structure Briefly describe the organisational structure of the institution. Student numbers Approximate FTE equivalent students of all programmes Staff numbers Approximate FTE equivalent of contracted educational and non-educational staff Visiting lectures Approximate number of visiting lecturers Visiting lecture ratio Approximate percentage of the programme is delivered by visiting lecturers? Budget size below 50,000€ 50,000€ - 100,000€ 100,000€ - 500,000€ 500,000€ - 1.000,000€ over 1.000,000€ Select an approximate range of the overall school budget (use figures from the year before the site visit) List of programmes and delivery modes List all programmes and delivery modes, specifying the programmes which will be submitted for ECTE Programme Accreditation. Functions, activities and mission statement List all activities (not only those that are being subject to ECTE accreditation). If available, copy and paste the institution's mission statement. D. FINDINGS This is the main section of the Review Report that assesses the compliance of the institution with the Institutional Standards (part A) of the Standards and Guidelines for ECTE accreditation. Each of the Guidelines is rated on a scale of 1-4. The standard is then given an overall compliance judgment. A.1 - Identity and purpose 'Institutions have clearly formulated statements of identity and purpose.' Previous recommendations and requirements Please write these here (if any) and include the year they were made and any action that was taken since. Compliance rating of Guideline A.1.1 - Identity 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.1.1 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.1.2 - Legal and fiscal status 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.1.2 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.1.3 - Vision and mission 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.1.3 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.1.4 - Public information 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.1.4 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Analysis Based on the evidence described above, how far does the institution meet the standard? Also provide any reasons or explanations for lack of compliance. Panel commendations Please list areas of good practice to commend. Panel recommendations Please list actions for further improvement and development this standard. Panel requirements Please indicate actions for putting this standard, or a significant aspect thereof, into existence. Panel conclusion for Standard A.1 - Identity and Purpose Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant A.2 - Governance and quality assurance 'Institutions have appropriate and effective governance and quality assurance structures.' Previous recommendations and requirements Please write these here (if any) and include the year they were made and any action that was taken since. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.1 - Governance 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.1 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.2 - Leadership and management 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.2 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.3 - Decision-making structures 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.3 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.4 - Strategic planning 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.4 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.5 - Internal quality assurance policies and procedures 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.5 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Compliance rating of Guideline A.2.6 - Cyclical external quality assurance 1 2 3 4 (1=fully, 2=substantially, 3=partially, 4=non-compliant) Comments on Guideline A.2.6 Please also describe evidence of implementation. Analysis Based on the evidence described above, how far does the institution meet the standard? Also provide any reasons or explanations for lack of compliance. Panel commendations Please list areas of good practice to commend. Panel recommendations Please list actions for further improvement and development this standard. Panel requirements Please indicate actions for putting this standard, or a significant aspect thereof, into existence. Panel conclusion for Standard A.1 - Identity and Purpose Fully compliant Substantially compliant Partially compliant Non-compliant Submit Δ Share this:TwitterFacebookWhatsAppPrint