Visitation Feedback Summary

Provide general information on the site visit

Name of institution

Country

Visitation Category

Institutional Accreditation

Programme Accreditation

Cyclical Review

Mode of visit

Entirely physical

Entirely online

Hybrid phases

Hybrid team

(See Guidelines for Site Visits: 1.6)

For Programme Accreditation and Cyclical Review indicate the programmes under review

Write the names of the VET panel members. To be completed by both HOSTING INSTITUTION and VET PANEL members.

Panel Leader

Panel Member

Student Member

Review Secretary

What areas of good practice or improvement can be highlighted around the composition of the VET panel.

Under the 'General Evaluation' label, did the average satisfaction level of the institution match the satisfaction of the VET panel?

The evaluations were generally aligned

The evaluations were discrepant (specify)The evaluations were discrepant (specify)

What areas were evaluated particularly well and should be recommended as good practice?

Please indicate areas of clear discrepancy.

What weaknesses have emerged from the evaluation that need to be worked on?

Is there a need to follow up areas of low satisfaction with the institution or with the VETs?

No

Yes (please specify)Yes (please specify)

How might the members of the VET be helped in their development given the feedback from this visit?

Please indicate areas of clear discrepancy.

Date of site visit

Indicate the starting date

Mode of evaluation session Mode of evaluation session

Date of evaluation session with Review Secretary and VET panel

Name of person completing this form

Signature